These aren’t my words, yet they speak for everyone who feels the same deep concern over forced Digital ID’s.
I joined Facebook’s Digital Defiance from which I read these words. I thank them for standing strong.
The words below were posted on FaceBook last week by David Otho Gagin. It’s written with intelligence rather than panic. Read it. Be afraid of nothing. Stay undistracted. Stay undivided. Stay united against tyranny. And remember the Digital ID system has already been hacked twice.
]- – – – –
‘Starmer has painted himself into the ugliest of Fabian corners.
He wants to mandate digital ID for every Briton. He dresses it up in two slogans: “preventing fraud” and “stopping illegal working.” Fabian Blair used the same lines in 2004 when he tried and failed to push ID cards.
But here’s the trap he’s in:
Britain is bound by the European Convention on Human Rights.
Article 8 protects our privacy, Article 14 bans discrimination.
Strasbourg has already ruled against blanket DNA and biometric databases in S & Marper v UK (2008) and against unregulated facial recognition in Bridges v South Wales Police (2020).
You can not strip people of their livelihoods or force them into surveillance on pain of starvation.
Any mandatory digital ID tied to work or survival would fail the ECHR tests of legality, necessity and proportionality.
And it gets worse for him. Under the UN’s Agenda 2030, SDG 16.9, states have pledged to provide “legal identity for all, including birth registration.” That language was written to protect migrants, stateless persons and refugees.
It means digital ID can not lawfully be used to exclude foreign workers from jobs or services. It has to empower them. So if Starmer sells this scheme as a way to block “illegal working,” he’s trampling over the very human rights treaties he boasts of upholding.
So, what are his choices?
He could leave the ECHR. But that unlocks the opposite of his Fabian wet dream. Outside the Convention, Britain could indeed deport en masse, shut borders, and sweep away the legal brakes on state power.
(Labour will never do that because the Fabian project depends on international treaties and courts to entrench their system above democratic challenge.)
Or he could stay in the ECHR. But then his hands are tied. The judges in Strasbourg have already said you can’t keep every citizen’s DNA, can’t roll out facial recognition without safeguards, can’t discriminate against migrants. By that precedent, he can not compel digital ID without being dragged through the courts.
And then there’s Agenda 2030 itself. It locks in digital ID as a protection for migrants, not a punishment. So he can’t use it against them either.
So, Starmer’s “digital ID” agenda is a Fabian mess. It can’t lawfully be forced on migrants. It can’t lawfully be forced on citizens without leaving the ECHR. And leaving the ECHR would destroy his arguments against deportations.
He is boxed in. The only way he can get his way is if we let him bluff us into believing this is inevitable. It isn’t. He’s trapped.’
Just Say NO
Digital ID isn’t about convenience or efficiency. It’s certainly not a “fix.” It’s enforced servitude. This is straight from the politician’s playbook: manufacture a crisis, amplify the panic, then sell the solution to ensure we continue to vote for them. In this case the solution annihilates our freedom.
Imagine a life lived under relentless surveillance, permissioned gateways, systems that log, rank and revoke. One switch could cut your pay, your care, your travel, your voice and deny you access to your bank account resulting in homelessness, because you can’t pay your rent or mortgage.
Let’s not forget that a nationwide implementation of a Digital ID system would probably require nationwide implementation of 5G, which is currently being installed but not yet fully completed.
This would increase by several orders of magnitude the amount of electrosmog – electromagnetic radio frequencies (EMF) – already in the atmosphere. Whilst the UK government ignores the health damage caused by non-ionising EMR (Electromagnetic Radiation) many thousands of peer reviewed research papers have clearly demonstrated the harms produced by non-ionising EMFs, including non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, sperm damage and neurological effects’ in the long term. Amongst many adverse health effects, the World Health Organisation (WHO) long ago in 2011 classified radio frequency as a Group 2B possible human carcinogen.
Over in the USA, Hakeem Anwar, a software engineer exposed how Big Tech’s surveillance network operates behind the scenes.
From his time managing sensitive medical data, Hakeem witnessed firsthand how personal information – even children’s Social Security numbers – is mishandled and sold.
In addition….
- Google’s “Sensor Vault” enables law enforcement to track phones in specific locations through geofence warrants.
- Apple and Google collaborate on data collection despite appearing to compete.
- Operating systems and supposedly secure apps still feed data pipelines.
- Reclaiming privacy is about more than tech. It’s about sovereignty and awareness.
What Can We Do?
Petitions are the adult equivalent of writing to Santa – earnest, hopeful, and usually futile. Action, though still leaves fingerprints. Our parents and grandparents bled through two world wars to buy us the mortgage of freedom, and we’ve been living off the interest ever since. What’s coming isn’t a war with trenches or uniforms, but don’t kid yourself, the enemy’s still there. They just learned to dress better and control politicians.
Thankfully Privacy Academy has a plan to stop Digital ID via Twitter (X):
Click Here to Access the Upcoming Livestream.
HERE’S A DATE FOR YOUR DIARY
“Our sovereignty cannot be bartered away by the Solicitor General, or even by the Prime Minister, because it is not theirs to give. I speak not only of the sovereignty of this house, but also of the higher sovereignty of the British people”. Mr Alfred Morris MP. Hansard, 17 Feb 1972 Pg. 727-8.
Graeme DInnen
ResourcesForLife.net
Leave a Reply